Registered Member #102
Joined Sun Aug 15 2004, 08:28PM
posts 13
I want to know, if i can replace LSBOX with XLABEL. And which module brings more performance and what are the advantages/disadvantages of lsbox and xlabel
Registered Member #89
Joined: Sat Jul 31 2004, 07:22PM
posts 12
Hi!
Well, my guess is that it depends of what you want to do.
But as far as I can tell, when you have xLabel, you dont need LSBox.
Perssonaly, I hook everything in xLabel (even labels) and it works just great
And IMHO, it works better than LSBox, with LSBox I had some transparency issues, that I don't have with xLabel.
Registered Member #39
Joined: Mon May 31 2004, 12:24PM
posts 24
Lol Kagaku
Maybe xLsBox would be better!
I think the only pro of LsBox compared with xLabel is the moving capabilities! For example: docking. And dragging the box made by xLabel isn't so smooth like LsBox. Besides that, xLabel is far superior.
Maybe you should ask this question in another forum (Litestep.net), because there is too many xLabel’s fans ins this forum (me me me), for more opinions
Hi, just on thing about moving of xLabel.
With the xpopup-0.9 version i will test another moving code similar to xLabel, but i think better (smoother), so if you test xPopup and say, "Yes the Move is Smooth", then post it here and i will change the code in xLabel too.
Registered Member #39
Joined: Mon May 31 2004, 12:24PM
posts 24
About moving of xLabel. I have tested xPopup v0.9 (1st time i used xPopup ,because lack of time). and ... "Yes the Move is Smooth"
Looking foward to xLabel
Hi to all,
Just to tease and push LsBox over the cliff.
I'm adding Docking Support to xLabel =) And the best it works perfect with SnapTo Feature.
Auto (Un)Docking on SnapTo, Manual Bang, Startup setting, better Moving Code, ...
I cannot evaluate my Docking with LsBox Docking, cause i never tested LsBox Docking Features (never worked for me in a useable way), but in my opinion my implementation by far enough to reach xLabel Standards
